Legislature(2011 - 2012)BELTZ 105 (TSBldg)
03/23/2012 01:30 PM Senate JUDICIARY
| Audio | Topic |
|---|---|
| Start | |
| SB200 | |
| SB210 | |
| SB212 | |
| SB180 | |
| SB138 | |
| Adjourn |
* first hearing in first committee of referral
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
+ teleconferenced
= bill was previously heard/scheduled
| *+ | SJR 19 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 180 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | SB 138 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| + | TELECONFERENCED | ||
| += | SB 200 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 210 | TELECONFERENCED | |
| += | SB 212 | TELECONFERENCED | |
SB 200-EYEWITNESSES AND LINEUPS
1:33:18 PM
CHAIR FRENCH announced the consideration of SB 200, and asked
for a motion to adopt the proposed committee substitute (CS),
version I.
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI moved to adopt the work draft CS for SB
200, labeled 27-LS1136\I, as the working document.
CHAIR FRENCH, speaking as the sponsor of SB 200, reviewed the
changes made in the current CS. Page 1, line 12, the word
"relevant" was added to clarify that only information relevant
to the situation should be collected in the statement. For
example, the weather conditions were not relevant if the
eyewitness account occurred indoors. Page 2, lines 9-11, clarify
that the admissibility of eyewitness identification as evidence
was not precluded by the failure of an agency to adopt
procedures or satisfy the requirement under subsection (a).
Finally, technical changes were made in Section 1, subsection
(a)(2) on page 2, to clarify provisions about test
administrators. Finding no questions about the CS, he asked for
a motion.
1:35:05 PM
SENATOR WIELECHOWSKI moved to report CS for SB 200, version I,
from committee with individual recommendations and attached
fiscal note(s).
CHAIR FRENCH announced that without objection, CSSB 200(JUD)
moved from the Senate Judiciary Standing Committee.